Text of Statute
(A) No physician, health care facility, other health care provider, person authorized to engage in the business of insurance in this state under Title XXXIX [39] of the Revised Code, health insuring corporation, other health care plan, or legal entity that is self-insured and provides benefits to its employees or members shall require an individual to create or refrain from creating a durable power of attorney for health care, or shall require an individual to revoke or refrain from revoking a durable power of attorney for health care, as a condition of being admitted to a health care facility, being provided health care, being insured, or being the recipient of benefits.
(B)(1) Subject to division (B)(2) of this section, an attending physician of a principal or a health care facility in which a principal is confined may refuse to comply or allow compliance with the instructions of an attorney in fact under a durable power of attorney for health care on the basis of a matter of conscience or on another basis. An employee or agent of an attending physician of a principal or of a health care facility in which a principal is confined may refuse to comply with the instructions of an attorney in fact under a durable power of attorney for health care on the basis of a matter of conscience.
(2)(a) An attending physician of a principal who, or health care facility in
which a principal is confined that, is not willing or not able to comply or
allow compliance with the instructions of an attorney in fact under a durable
power of attorney for health care to use or continue, or to withhold or
withdraw, health care that were* given under division (A) of section (b) If the instruction of an attorney in fact under a durable power of
attorney for health care that is given under division (A) of section (C) Sections (D)(1) If the attending physician of a principal and one other physician who
examines the principal determine that the principal is in a terminal condition
or in a permanently unconscious state, if the attending physician additionally
determines that the principal has lost the capacity to make informed health care
decisions for the principal and that there is no reasonable possibility that the
principal will regain the capacity to make informed health care decisions for
the principal, and if the attorney in fact under the principal's durable power
of attorney for health care makes a health care decision pertaining to the use
or continuation, or the withholding or withdrawal, of life-sustaining treatment,
the attending physician shall do all of the following:
(a) Record the determinations and health care decision in the principal's
medical record;
(b) Make a good faith effort, and use reasonable diligence, to notify the
appropriate individual or individuals, in accordance with the following
descending order of priority, of the determinations and health care decision:
(i) If any, the guardian of the principal. This division does not permit or
require the appointment of a guardian for the principal.
(ii) The principal's spouse;
(iii) The principal's adult children who are available within a reasonable
period of time for consultation with the principal's attending physician;
(iv) The principal's parents;
(v) An adult sibling of the principal or, if there is more than one adult
sibling, a majority of the principal's adult siblings who are available within a
reasonable period of time for such consultation.
(c) Record in the principal's medical record the names of the individual or
individuals notified pursuant to division (D)(1)(b) of this section and the
manner of notification;
(d) Afford time for the individual or individuals notified pursuant to
division (D)(1)(b) of this section to object in the manner described in division
(D)(3)(a) of this section.
(2)(a) If, despite making a good faith effort, and despite using reasonable
diligence, to notify the appropriate individual or individuals described in
division (D)(1)(b) of this section, the attending physician cannot notify the
individual or individuals of the determinations and health care decision because
the individual or individuals are deceased, cannot be located, or cannot be
notified for some other reason, the requirements of divisions (D)(1)(b), (c),
and (d) of this section and, except as provided in division (D)(3)(b) of this
section, the provisions of divisions (D)(3) to (6) of this section shall not
apply in connection with the principal. However, the attending physician shall
record in the principal's medical record information pertaining to the reason
for the failure to provide the requisite notices and information pertaining to
the nature of the good faith effort and reasonable diligence used.
(b) The requirements of divisions (D)(1)(b), (c), and (d) of this section
and, except as provided in division (D)(3)(b) of this section, the provisions of
divisions (D)(3) to (6) of this section shall not apply in connection with the
principal if only one individual would have to be notified pursuant to division
(D)(1)(b) of this section and that individual is the attorney in fact under the
durable power of attorney for health care. However, the attending physician of
the principal shall record in the principal's medical record information
indicating that no notice was given pursuant to division (D)(1)(b) of this
section because of the provisions of division (D)(2)(b) of this section.
(3)(a) Within forty-eight hours after receipt of a notice pursuant to
division (D)(1) of this section, any individual so notified shall advise the
attending physician of the principal whether the individual objects on a basis
specified in division (D)(4)(c) of this section. If an objection as described in
that division is communicated to the attending physician, then, within two
business days after the communication, the individual shall file a complaint as
described in division (D)(4) of this section in the probate court of the county
in which the principal is located. If the individual fails to so file a
complaint, the individual's objections as described in division (D)(4)(c) of
this section shall be considered to be void.
(b) Within forty-eight hours after the priority individual or any member of a
priority class of individuals receives a notice pursuant to division (D)(1) of
this section or within forty-eight hours after information pertaining to an
unnotified priority individual or unnotified priority class of individuals is
recorded in a principal's medical record pursuant to division (D)(2)(a) or (b)
of this section, the individual or a majority of the individuals in the next
class of individuals that pertains to the principal in the descending order of
priority set forth in divisions (D)(1)(b)(i) to (v) of this section shall advise
the attending physician of the principal whether the individual or majority
object on a basis specified in division (D)(4)(c) of this section. If an
objection as described in that division is communicated to the attending
physician, then, within two business days after the communication, the objecting
individual or majority shall file a complaint as described in division (D)(4) of
this section in the probate court of the county in which the principal is
located. If the objecting individual or majority fails to file a complaint, the
objections as described in division (D)(4)(c) of this section shall be
considered to be void.
(4) A complaint of an individual that is filed in accordance with division
(D)(3)(a) of this section or of an individual or majority of individuals that is
filed in accordance with division (D)(3)(b) of this section shall satisfy all of
the following:
(a) Name any health care facility in which the principal is confined;
(b) Name the principal, the principal's attending physician, and the
consulting physician associated with the determination that the principal is in
a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious state;
(c) Indicate whether the plaintiff or plaintiffs object on one or more of the
following bases:
(i) To the attending physician's determination that the principal has lost
the capacity to make informed health care decisions for the principal;
(ii) To the attending physician's determination that there is no reasonable
possibility that the principal will regain the capacity to make informed health
care decisions for the principal;
(iii) That, in exercising the attorney in fact's authority, the attorney in
fact is not acting consistently with the desires of the principal or, if the
desires of the principal are unknown, in the best interest of the principal;
(iv) That the durable power of attorney for health care has expired or
otherwise is no longer effective;
(v) To the attending physician's and consulting physician's determinations
that the principal is in a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious
state;
(vi) That the attorney in fact's health care decision pertaining to the use
or continuation, or the withholding or withdrawal, of life-sustaining treatment
is not authorized by the durable power of attorney for health care or is
prohibited under section (vii) That the durable power of attorney for health care was executed when
the principal was not of sound mind or was under or subject to duress, fraud, or
undue influence;
(viii) That the durable power of attorney for health care otherwise does not
substantially comply with section (d) Request the probate court to issue one or more of the following types of
orders:
(i) An order to the attending physician to reevaluate, in light of the court
proceedings, the determination that the principal has lost the capacity to make
informed health care decisions for the principal, the determination that the
principal is in a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious state, or
the determination that there is no reasonable possibility that the principal
will regain the capacity to make informed health care decisions for the
principal;
(ii) An order to the attorney in fact to act consistently with the desires of
the principal or, if the desires of the principal are unknown, in the best
interest of the principal in exercising the attorney in fact's authority, or to
make only health care decisions pertaining to life-sustaining treatment that are
authorized by the durable power of attorney for health care and that are not
prohibited under section (iii) An order invalidating the durable power of attorney for health care
because it has expired or otherwise is no longer effective, it was executed when
the principal was not of sound mind or was under or subject to duress, fraud, or
undue influence, or it otherwise does not substantially comply with section (e) Be accompanied by an affidavit of the plaintiff or plaintiffs that
includes averments relative to whether the plaintiff is an individual or the
plaintiffs are individuals as described in division (D)(1)(b)(i), (ii), (iii),
(iv), or (v) of this section and to the factual basis for the plaintiff's or the
plaintiffs' objections;
(f) Name any individuals who were notified by the attending physician in
accordance with division (D)(1)(b) of this section and who are not joining in
the complaint as plaintiffs;
(g) Name, in the caption of the complaint, as defendants the attending
physician of the principal, the attorney in fact under the durable power of
attorney for health care, the consulting physician associated with the
determination that the principal is in a terminal condition or in a permanently
unconscious state, any health care facility in which the principal is confined,
and any individuals who were notified by the attending physician in accordance
with division (D)(1)(b) of this section and who are not joining in the complaint
as plaintiffs.
(5) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Revised Code or of the
Rules of Civil Procedure, the state and persons other than an objecting
individual as described in division (D)(3)(a) of this section, other than an
objecting individual or majority of individuals as described in division
(D)(3)(b) of this section, and other than persons described in division
(D)(4)(g) of this section are prohibited from commencing a civil action under
division (D) of this section and from joining or being joined as parties to an
action commenced under division (D) of this section, including joining by way of
intervention.
(6)(a) A probate court in which a complaint as described in division (D)(4)
of this section is filed within the period specified in division (D)(3)(a) or
(b) of this section shall conduct a hearing on the complaint after a copy of it
and a notice of the hearing have been served upon the defendants. The clerk of
the probate court in which the complaint is filed shall cause the complaint and
the notice of the hearing to be so served in accordance with the Rules of Civil
Procedure, which service shall be made, if possible, within three days after the
filing of the complaint. The hearing shall be conducted at the earliest possible
time, but no later than the third business day after such service has been
completed. Immediately following the hearing, the court shall enter on its
journal its determination whether a requested order will be issued.
(b) If the health care decision of the attorney in fact authorized the use or
continuation of life-sustaining treatment and if the plaintiff or plaintiffs
requested a reevaluation order to the attending physician of the principal or an
order to the attorney in fact as described in division (D)(4)(d)(i) or (ii) of
this section, the court shall issue the requested order only if it finds that
the plaintiff or plaintiffs have established a factual basis for the objection
or objections involved by clear and convincing evidence and, if applicable, to a
reasonable degree of medical certainty and in accordance with reasonable medical
standards.
(c) If the health care decision of the attorney in fact authorized the
withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and if the plaintiff or
plaintiffs requested a reevaluation order to the attending physician of the
principal or an order to the attorney in fact as described in division (D)(4)(d)(i)
or (ii) of this section, the court shall issue the requested order only if it
finds that the plaintiff or plaintiffs have established a factual basis for the
objection or objections involved by a preponderance of the evidence and, if
applicable, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty and in accordance with
reasonable medical standards.
(d) If the plaintiff or plaintiffs requested an invalidation order as
described in division (D)(4)(d)(iii) of this section, the court shall issue the
order only if it finds that the plaintiff or plaintiffs have established a
factual basis for the objection or objections involved by clear and convincing
evidence.
(e) If the court issues a reevaluation order to the principal's attending
physician pursuant to division (D)(6)(b) or (c) of this section, the attending
physician shall make the requisite reevaluation. If, after doing so, the
attending physician again determines that the principal has lost the capacity to
make informed health care decisions for the principal, that the principal is in
a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious state, or that there is no
reasonable possibility that the principal will regain the capacity to make
informed health care decisions for the principal, the attending physician shall
notify the court in writing of the determination and comply with division (B)(2)
of this section.
(E)(1) In connection with the provision of comfort care in a manner
consistent with divisions (C) and (E) of section (2) If, at any time, a priority individual or any member of a priority class
of individuals under division (D)(1)(b) of this section or if, at any time, the
individual or a majority of the individuals in the next class of individuals
that pertains to the principal in the descending order of priority set forth in
that division, believes in good faith that both of the following circumstances
apply, the priority individual, the member of the priority class of individuals,
or the individual or majority of individuals in the next class of individuals
that pertains to the principal may commence an action in the probate court of
the county in which a principal who is in a terminal condition or permanently
unconscious state is located for the issuance of an order mandating the use or
continuation of comfort care in connection with the principal in a manner that
is consistent with sections (a) Comfort care is not being used or continued in connection with the
principal.
(b) The withholding or withdrawal of the comfort care is contrary to sections
(F) Except as provided in divisions (D) and (E) of this section in connection
with principals who are in a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious
state, sections (G) A durable power of attorney for health care, or other document, that is
similar to a durable power of attorney for health care authorized by sections HISTORY: 143 v S 13 (Eff 9-27-89); 144 v S 1 (Eff 10-10-91); 145 v H 343
(Eff 7-22-94); 147 v S 67 (Eff 6-4-97); 147 v S 66. Eff 7-22-98.
* So in enrolled bill, division (B)(2)(a).
© Copyright 2000
Containing legislation passed and filed through August 1, 2000.