§ 2305.10 Bodily injury or injury to personal property. 

Text of Statute

-- Pre-HB 350 (Tort Reform Act) version of this section.

An action for bodily injury or injuring personal property shall be brought within two years after the cause thereof arose.

For purposes of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury caused by exposure to asbestos or to chromium in any of its chemical forms arises upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that he has been injured by such exposure, or upon the date on which, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, he should have become aware that he had been injured by the exposure, whichever date occurs first.

For purposes of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury incurred by a veteran through exposure to chemical defoliants or herbicides or other causative agents, including agent orange, arises upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that he has been injured by such exposure.

As used in this section, "agent orange," "causative agent," and "veteran" have the same meanings as in section 5903.21 of the Revised Code.

For purposes of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury which may be caused by exposure to diethylstilbestrol or other nonsteroidal synthetic estrogens, including exposure before birth, arises upon the date on which the plaintiff learns from a licensed physician that he has an injury which may be related to such exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence he should have become aware that he has an injury which may be related to such exposure, whichever date occurs first.

HISTORY: GC § 11224-1; 112 v 237; Bureau of Code Revision, 10-1-53; 138 v H 716 (Eff 6-12-80); 139 v S 406 (Eff 8-26-82); 140 v H 72. Eff 5-31-84.

  § 2305.10 Product liability, bodily injury or injury to personal property. 

Text of Statute

-- This version of the statute was enacted in 1996 as part of Am. Sub. H.B. 350. In State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that "Am. Sub. H.B. No. 350 (the Tort Reform Act) violates the one-subject provision of § 15(D), art II of the Ohio Constitution, and is unconstitutional in toto." Because of that decision any pre-HB 350 versions and any post-HB 350 amendments to this statute are also shown.

An ( A ) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN DIVISION ( C ) OF THIS SECTION, AN action BASED ON A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM AND AN ACTION for bodily injury or injuring personal property shall be brought within two years after the cause thereof arose OF ACTION ACCRUES. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN DIVISIONS ( B )(1) TO (4) OF THIS SECTION, A CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES UNDER THIS DIVISION WHEN THE INJURY OR LOSS TO PERSON OR PROPERTY OCCURS.

( B )(1) FOR PURPOSES OF DIVISION ( A ) OF THIS SECTION, A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BODILY INJURY THAT IS NOT DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ( B )(2), (3), OR (4) OF THIS SECTION AND THAT IS CAUSED BY EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC CHEMICALS, ETHICAL DRUGS, OR ETHICAL MEDICAL DEVICES ACCRUES UPON THE DATE ON WHICH THE PLAINTIFF IS INFORMED BY COMPETENT MEDICAL AUTHORITY THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS AN INJURY THAT IS RELATED TO THE EXPOSURE, OR UPON THE DATE ON WHICH BY THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE THE PLAINTIFF SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS AN INJURY THAT IS RELATED TO THE EXPOSURE, WHICHEVER DATE OCCURS FIRST.

( 2 ) For purposes of DIVISION ( A ) OF this section, a cause of action for bodily injury caused by exposure to asbestos or to chromium in any of its chemical forms arises ACCRUES upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that he THE PLAINTIFF has been injured by such AN INJURY THAT IS RELATED TO THE exposure, or upon the date on which , by the exercise of reasonable diligence , he THE PLAINTIFF should have become aware KNOWN that he had been injured by THE PLAINTIFF HAS AN INJURY THAT IS RELATED TO the exposure, whichever date occurs first.

( 3 ) For purposes of DIVISION ( A ) OF this section, a cause of action for bodily injury incurred by a veteran through exposure to chemical defoliants or herbicides or other causative agents, including agent orange, arises ACCRUES upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that he THE PLAINTIFF has been injured by such AN INJURY THAT IS RELATED TO THE exposure.

As used in this section, "agent orange," "causative agent," and "veteran" have the same meanings as in section 5903.21 of the Revised Code.

( 4 ) For purposes of DIVISION ( A ) OF this section, a cause of action for bodily injury which may be caused by exposure to diethylstilbestrol or other nonsteroidal synthetic estrogens, including exposure before birth, arises ACCRUES upon the date on which the plaintiff learns from a licensed physician IS INFORMED BY COMPETENT MEDICAL AUTHORITY that he THE PLAINTIFF has an injury which may be THAT IS related to such THE exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence he THE PLAINTIFF should have become aware KNOWN that he THE PLAINTIFF has an injury which may be THAT IS related to such THE exposure, whichever date occurs first.

( C )(1) EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN DIVISIONS ( C )(2), (3), (4), (5), AND (6) OF THIS SECTION, NO CAUSE OF ACTION BASED ON A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM SHALL ACCRUE AGAINST THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER OF A PRODUCT LATER THAN FIFTEEN YEARS FROM THE DATE THAT THE PRODUCT WAS DELIVERED TO ITS FIRST PURCHASER OR FIRST LESSEE WHO WAS NOT ENGAGED IN A BUSINESS IN WHICH THE PRODUCT WAS USED AS A COMPONENT IN THE PRODUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, CREATION, ASSEMBLY, OR REBUILDING OF ANOTHER PRODUCT.

(2) DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY IF THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER OF A PRODUCT ENGAGED IN FRAUD IN REGARD TO INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AND THE FRAUD CONTRIBUTED TO THE HARM THAT IS ALLEGED IN A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM.

(3) DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION DOES NOT BAR AN ACTION BASED ON A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM AGAINST A MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER OF A PRODUCT WHO MADE AN EXPRESS, WRITTEN WARRANTY AS TO THE SAFETY OF THE PRODUCT THAT WAS FOR A PERIOD LONGER THAN FIFTEEN YEARS AND THAT HAS NOT EXPIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THAT WARRANTY.

(4) IF THE CAUSE OF ACTION RELATIVE TO A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM ACCRUES DURING THE FIFTEEN-YEAR PERIOD DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION BUT LESS THAN TWO YEARS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THAT PERIOD, AN ACTION BASED ON THE PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM MAY BE COMMENCED WITHIN TWO YEARS AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES.

(5) IF A CAUSE OF ACTION RELATIVE TO A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM ACCRUES DURING THE FIFTEEN-YEAR PERIOD DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION AND THE CLAIMANT CANNOT COMMENCE AN ACTION DURING THAT PERIOD DUE TO A DISABILITY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 2305.16 OF THE R EVISED C ODE, AN ACTION BASED ON THE PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM MAY BE COMMENCED WITHIN TWO YEARS AFTER THE DISABILITY IS REMOVED.

(6)( a ) DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION DOES NOT BAR AN ACTION BASED ON A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM AGAINST A MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER OF A PRODUCT IF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:

( i ) THE ACTION IS FOR BODILY INJURY.

( ii ) THE PRODUCT INVOLVED IS A SUBSTANCE DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ( B ) OF THIS SECTION.

( iii ) THE BODILY INJURY RESULTS FROM EXPOSURE TO THE PRODUCT DURING THE FIFTEEN-YEAR PERIOD DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ( C )(1) OF THIS SECTION.

( b ) IF DIVISION ( C )(6)( a ) OF THIS SECTION APPLIES, THE CAUSE OF ACTION SHALL ACCRUE UPON THE DATE ON WHICH THE CLAIMANT IS INFORMED BY COMPETENT MEDICAL AUTHORITY THAT THE BODILY INJURY WAS RELATED TO THE EXPOSURE TO THE PRODUCT, OR UPON THE DATE ON WHICH BY THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE THE CLAIMANT SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE BODILY INJURY WAS RELATED TO THE EXPOSURE TO THE PRODUCT, WHICHEVER DATE OCCURS FIRST. THE ACTION BASED ON THE PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN TWO YEARS AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES AND SHALL NOT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TWO YEARS AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES.

( D ) THIS SECTION DOES NOT CREATE A NEW CAUSE OF ACTION OR SUBSTANTIVE LEGAL RIGHT AGAINST ANY PERSON INVOLVING A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM.

( E ) AS USED IN THIS SECTION:

(1) "AGENT ORANGE," "CAUSATIVE AGENT," AND "VETERAN" HAVE THE SAME MEANINGS AS IN SECTION 5903.21 OF THE R EVISED C ODE.

(2) "ETHICAL DRUG," "ETHICAL MEDICAL DEVICE," "MANUFACTURER," "PRODUCT," AND "SUPPLIER" HAVE THE SAME MEANINGS AS IN SECTION 2307.71 OF THE R EVISED C ODE.

(3) "HARM" MEANS INJURY, DEATH, OR LOSS TO PERSON OR PROPERTY.

(4) "PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM" MEANS A CLAIM THAT SEEKS TO RECOVER COMPENSATORY DAMAGES FROM A MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER FOR HARM THAT ALLEGEDLY AROSE FROM THE DESIGN, FORMULATION, PRODUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, CREATION, ASSEMBLY, REBUILDING, TESTING, OR MARKETING OF A PRODUCT, FROM A WARNING, INSTRUCTION, OR LACK OF WARNING OR INSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH A PRODUCT, OR FROM A FAILURE OF A PRODUCT TO CONFORM TO A RELEVANT REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY.

( F ) THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE PURELY REMEDIAL IN OPERATION AND SHALL BE APPLIED IN A REMEDIAL MANNER IN ANY CIVIL ACTION COMMENCED ON OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, IN WHICH THIS SECTION IS RELEVANT, REGARDLESS OF WHEN THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUED AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER SECTION OF THE R EVISED C ODE OR PRIOR RULE OF LAW OF THIS STATE, BUT SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO APPLY TO ANY CIVIL ACTION PENDING PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION.

HISTORY: GC § 11224-1; 112 v 237; Bureau of Code Revision, 10-1-53; 138 v H 716 (Eff 6-12-80); 139 v S 406 (Eff 8-26-82); 140 v H 72 (Eff 5-31-84); 146 v H 350. Eff 1-27-97.


© Copyright 2000
Containing legislation passed and filed through August 1, 2000.